प्रिय, प्रधानमंत्री महोदय जी, आप जो केंद्र सरकार की योजना चलाते है बिकास के लिए, उस योजना को सही रूप से चलाने के लिए सर्विसप्रोवाइडर से ठेके पर कर्मचारी रखे जाते है, वो ना तो वेतन देते है टाइम से और वेतन मांगने पर नौकरी से हटाने की धमकी देते है ,तब कर्मचारी मानशिक रूप से परेसान होकर काम को सही से नहीं कर पता है । अतः आप महोदय से नम्र निवेदन है कि या तो ठेके पर कर्मचारी ना रखे जाये और रखे जाये तो उन्हें अपना जीवन निर्वाहन के लिए समय से वेतन दिया जाये और जिससे वो पुरे मन से काम को कर सके ।

pls take suggestions frm crorepathis and huge companys secretaries

Namaste ,Job created at Village level ,upgrade SME enterprises & develop people with skill ,publication all type of required work ,some responsibility taken by government time to time upgrade ,jo jaisa waisa job .thanks

Respected Sir As i have come to know that the next radio announce is about to talk with aspirants of board/competitive exam. But Modi jee we must think about those aspirants who passes from a governmental institute like IIT,IIM,AIIMS etc. and went to outside India for earning.So there should be some provisions to avoid this.Its disadvantages is that they served to other countries leaving their own county and it also causes the loss of huge wealth of Government. Please discuss it. Thank you

Niti Ayog. I have not come across cost benefit ratio analysis. while allocating funds by planning commission/state governments. It may be argued that cost benefit analysis for a hospital can not be made as hospitals are not supposed to make money. But a nominal benefit index in terms of health can allocated. So for all social sector projects can have a benefit index. It may be different for different regions. For example, an area prone with disease will have a higher index than a healthier area

Karthikeyan Danasagaran is right but difficult to implement. Even in 60s, it was suggested that instead of three shifts of 8 hours each, we should shift to four shifts of 6 hours each. It will increase the work force by 33%. The idea is to have more employment may be at lesser wages. It means to fill more stomachs by sharing their bread with those who go empty stomach. May be new age leaders and economists can work around it.

It is fine to have good economists on the NITI Ayog. But do they really understand India i.e., Bharat? They can not think like an ordinary Indian and appreciate his needs and aspirations. You require mixture of experts and persons with gross root connect. Amongst politicians of different hues, I can single out Raghuvansh Prasad Singh who should be on Niti Ayog. The national bodies should have persons from various walks of life including opposition. I may add that I have never met Raghuvansh Babu

Sir plz do somethn in govt jobs plz change chairman of ssc...ssc is ruining our career...delhi election result se kch samajhiye pura youth jo apk sath tha ab niras hai...

We are still working 48 to 70 hrs a week. If these time we reduced to 40 hrs more than half of the Indian population will have a job. This applies to all industries

Why are job been only created at places where there are more job (delhi, pune and bangalore)and people made to move. Why are new center for job are not been developed. Center where there low job why are they are not focused. Why some of the state left off. Decentralization of job might be a good option to stop recession. This will break the wage barrier which companies are holding to for long long time.